Man City News

Man City suffer £1.1m loss on 23 y/o despite signing him on a free transfer [Opinion]

|

Manchester City confirmed on Friday that Arijanet Muric joined Burnley on a permanent deal, ending a seven-year stay at the Etihad Stadium. The 23-year-old made only four appearances for the Sky Blues and was loaned out for most of his stint in England, but City have managed to minimise his net spend.

Where will Manchester City finish in the Premier League this season?

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th or lower

Signed on a free transfer from Grasshopper Club Zurich in 2015, Muric was earning £3k-per-week/£156k-a-year until his new deal in 2019 that saw his wages rise to £20k-per-week/£1.04m-a-year – the Kosovan international has taken home approximately £3.6m.

Muric was sold to Burnley for £2.5m, so City have suffered a £1.1m loss after seven years. The 23-year-old never realised his potential in Manchester and found himself on the periphery after underwhelming on loan. Temporary stints away were a chance for Muric to prove himself, but he didn’t take the opportunities.

Simon Bajkowski of the Manchester Evening News says City have attached a buyback clause to the goalkeeper’s contract, will get first option if he’s placed on the transfer list and will get a percentage of his sale. Muric hasn’t been in favour for many years, but City cover themselves when selling a young player so they can bring them back in the future or make extra money.

In other news, Man City should complete 4th summer signing soon but are guilty of poor negotiating

1 of 10

2012/13 season

Share this article

Sports journalist who is an avid football fan, enjoys debunking transfer rumours, loves to write pieces about players out in the cold and takes a large amount of pride getting a predicted XI 100% correct.

0 comments

  • Stanley James Duncan says:

    Crippy! Do you understand football finance? That’s a YES or NO answer. It’s OK to say no as how many of us have ever arranged football finance. Your article suggests it’s a No.
    Amortisation over 7 years on a free transfer. Muric has been on loan and clubs taking players on loan pay a fee (monthly) for doing so. Loaning out players is an income stream you have failed to take account of. So I’m prepared to wager rather than losing 1.1 million City will have at least broke even or indeed made a slight profit. Glad to put the record straight.

  • Alan Williamson says:

    here yougo Bro, with the negativity again..Whats your beef? City are a well run club you know despite that massive CHIP on your shoulder..Come on if you have ANY brains at all,(which you havent shown yet) write some balanced reports..POSITIVE man you look like a sad sorry fourth columnist

Comments are closed.